Vaporware: A Real Problem in the ERP Software Industry

Introduction

Vaporware is a pervasive issue in the ERP software industry, often leading to misled expectations, implementation challenges, and financial risks for businesses. This blog will delve into the concept of vaporware, its implications, and strategies to navigate the risks it presents during the software selection and implementation process.

Understanding Vaporware

Vaporware refers to software that is marketed and promised but not yet developed or possibly may never exist in the form presented. It often manifests as polished PowerPoint slides or impressive demo videos showcasing potential future capabilities of a product. These representations can be deceptive, as the actual software might be far from completion or entirely hypothetical.

The Dangers of Vaporware

1. Misleading Expectations: Businesses might base critical decisions on functionalities that are not yet available, leading to unrealistic expectations and potential project delays. This discrepancy between what is promised and what is delivered can cause significant disruption in operations.
2. Implementation Challenges: When the promised features are not ready by the time of implementation, it can lead to significant disruptions. Organizations might need to find workarounds or invest in additional customizations, increasing both time and cost.
3. Financial Risks: Investing in software based on future promises can lead to wasted resources if those promises are not fulfilled. This misallocation of resources can hamper other critical projects and lead to financial strain.

Identifying Vaporware

During the software selection process, differentiating between existing features and vaporware is crucial. Here are some steps to help identify vaporware:

1. Scrutinize Product Roadmaps: Software vendors often provide product roadmaps outlining future features. While these roadmaps are useful, they can be speculative. It is essential to ask for a detailed timeline and clarify which features are currently available versus those planned for the future.
2. Demand Live Demos: Requesting live demonstrations of the actual software instead of relying solely on mock-ups or slide presentations can provide a clearer picture of the software’s current capabilities. This practice helps in understanding the real functionalities that are available.
3. Ask Specific Questions: Direct inquiries about what features exist today and what is still in development are essential. Understanding the timeline for upcoming features and any past delays or changes can provide insights into the vendor’s reliability.
4. Seek References: Engaging with current users of the software to understand their experiences, especially regarding any promised features that have yet to materialize, can offer a practical perspective on the vendor’s claims.

Evaluating Functionality as a Continuum

When assessing software, it is vital to view functionality on a spectrum rather than a binary “yes or no” basis. This approach helps in understanding the depth and maturity of the features:

1. Quantitative Rankings: Instead of simply noting that a feature exists, assign a ranking to how well it meets the organization’s needs (e.g., on a scale of 1 to 10). This method highlights differences in the quality and maturity of features across vendors.
2. Involve End Users: Feedback from the people who will be using the software daily is crucial. Their insights can help in understanding the practical implications of the software’s capabilities and how well they align with business requirements.

Conducting a Gap Analysis

A thorough gap analysis is essential to identify any shortcomings in the software and plan for them effectively:

1. Map Business Processes: Comparing end-to-end business processes with the software’s functionalities helps in identifying any gaps where the software does not fully meet requirements. This mapping provides a clear view of where the software might fall short.
2. Plan for Workarounds: Deciding how to address these gaps, whether through third-party solutions, customizations, or changes in business processes, is crucial. Planning for workarounds helps in mitigating risks and ensuring smoother implementation.
3. Set Realistic Expectations: Clearly communicating any identified gaps and the plan to address them to all stakeholders is essential. Transparency in this phase helps in managing expectations and reducing the risk of dissatisfaction or disruption during implementation.

Creating a Realistic Implementation Plan

Once potential vaporware has been identified and a gap analysis conducted, creating a detailed implementation plan that reflects these realities is crucial:

1. Address Gaps Early: Determining how to handle identified gaps before the implementation begins is critical. This might involve additional tools, custom development, or process changes.
2. Monitor Progress: Continuously monitoring the vendor’s progress on delivering promised features is important. Regular check-ins help ensure that development is on track and allow for adjustments if necessary.
3. Prepare for Change: Being ready to adapt the plan as new information becomes available is key. Flexibility in approach helps in successfully navigating the challenges posed by vaporware.

Conclusion

Vaporware presents a real and significant problem in the ERP software industry. By being vigilant, asking the right questions, and planning thoroughly, organizations can minimize the risks and ensure their digital transformation journeys stay on track. It is crucial to approach software evaluation with a clear strategy, focusing on real functionalities and planning for gaps to achieve a successful implementation.

How Can We Help with your Business Transformation

At Third Stage Consulting, we’re committed to helping organizations navigate the complexities of digital transformation. Whether you’re embarking on a new transformation journey or seeking to optimize existing processes, our team is here to support you every step of the way.